2025-03-25 ACCESS EC Meeting Agenda & Summary
Attendees:
RAMPS: Stephen Deems (v), Dave Hart
MATCH: Shelley Knuth (v), Alana Romanella, Jim Griffioen
CONECT: Tim Boerner (v), Leslie Froeschl
MMS: Tom Furlani (v), Joe White
RP: Jeremy Fischer (v), Eric Adams
EAB: Chuck Pavloski
OpenCI: John Towns (v), Amit Majumdar , Lavanya Podila, Lisa Kaczmarczyk, Shannon Bradley
NSF: Sharon Geva, Puri Bangalore
Guest Speaker:
Parking Lot
(v) indicates a voting member
Decisions made during the meeting:
Use Decision Macro - Tool (under Insert Elements in the tool bar)
Agenda
Consent Agenda @Stephen Deems (5 mins)
Approval of summaries from prior EC meeting
Informational Items
RP Forum @Jeremy Fischer
Allocations Stephen Deems
Public-facing publications page is currently under development.
MATCH Shelley Knuth/Alana/Jim
CONECT Tim Boerner/Leslie
MMS Tom Furlani
EAB @Chuck P
Report from EAB from March meeting due April 30
Next EAB virtual 2 hr meeting being scheduled for the month of June
Waiting on summary from the survey request from March meeting
OpenCI John Towns
NSF Sharon and Puri
Milestone Review
To Do / Follow Ups
Reminders
Annual Reports
Upcoming Meetings & Events (ACCESS Engagement Tracker )
Additional Agenda Items
Web Presence Standing Committee @Dina Meek (15 mins) - presented at Quarterly Meeting
Conference Planning (5 mins)
Currently only have participation from 2 teams (Allocations + ACO)
EAB & Quarterly Meeting Debrief @Stephen Deems (10-15 mins)
Had good engagement - even tho it was virtual
Tom F - 2 days at 6 hours each was too long for virtual - what are people working on no one knew who was going first in this session
Stephen - Allocations will start first for the June session - need better ownership of the sessions so they stay in scope
John - we did plan to spread things across more days if we have enough content we will do 2 or 3 hours each day going forward
Joe - 2 hours solid was too much - 30 mins per team with more breaks in between (even 5 mins would help)
Sharon - people participating who are either newer or don’t usually participate was really great - and people felt comfortable to do it - and people did give push back - in bigger picture: was thrilled that all presentations had a comment saying “We are leading this and working with X other team” - this is great to call this out - also liked people speaking with RP forum
Lisa - someone asked what can we do to make virtual meetings better - there is science but it is a heavy lift - low hanging fruit:
Spacing things out - smaller chucks
How we develop slides - slides with mostly bullet points are hard - graphics are too small to read - both are counter productive - use more descriptive titles (use message you are trying to make - what is the point of the slide)
Jeremy - What’s everybody working on section - there was a lot of “not following instructions” for what to present - this was primarily a summary of Q3 and what will happen in Q4
Stephen - We had to do a lot to pivot to a virtual meeting - We do need to do more sticking to the script of what is in the Agenda - program needs to do a better job of talking with and not at each other when presenting - need more engagement - if presenting data give time to digest and ask questions
Shannon - did we do ourselves a disservice by attempting to leverage this meeting as a jumpstart to the annual review? Is this why some of the presentations didn’t seem to fit to the agenda?