2024-04-09 ACCESS EC Meeting Agenda & Summary
Attendees:
RAMPS: Stephen Deems (v), Dave Hart
MATCH: Shelley Knuth (v), Alana Romanella
CONECT: Tim Boerner (v), Leslie Froeschl
MMS: Tom Furlani (v), Joe White
OpenCI: John Towns (v), Shawn Strande, Lavanya Podila, Lisa Kaczmarczyk, Shannon Bradley
NSF: Tom Gulbransen, Sharon Geva
Guest Speaker: NA
(v) indicates a voting member
Decisions made during the meeting:
Use Decision Macro - Tool (under Insert Elements in the tool bar)
Agenda/Notes
Approval of summaries from prior EC meeting @John Towns (5 min)
Program Milestone Check @John Towns (5 mins)
Metrics we have been discussing - we have goals but have not approved the metrics yet - this will still need to be done
eval working group will come back with suggestions of what metrics we will be using
should be able to recommend after we finalize reviewing the surveys
Planning for June Quarterly meeting (~10 mins) - (all virtual)
it would be good to get feedback from the program
modified planning process - possibly creating a committee from members across project to drive the meetings - that way topics for agenda is driven by someone other than ACO - drive input from other areas
not an “official” committee - but a group of people from all the groups - but officially designated ( more than just sending out the question and asking people to respond)
let people know what we are thinking - so we can get a broader set of input
This group would not focus on logistics - just the agenda
Agenda Planning Committee - Content Planning Committee - make sure scope is clear
Start moving this forward this week - @Shawn Strande
developers session was really good - could we possibly have a parallel session for leadership things - other areas with tech detail in areas we are working on
What do project wide goals translate into as artifacts of things that are done to drive the goals
Working sessions as part of the meeting - less presentations - formal and informal across activities
What items on the agenda could have been handled via an EC meeting?
Brainstorming to new ideas + what we are doing and how it can be improved + how can we change
breakouts in virtual meeting
more things done together when we are together so we can leverage being together
Common structure - use same agenda each time? meeting after meeting so people can get used to the cadence
show personal things
Idea of structure is important - this impacts who needs to go / who wants to go
If people are flying halfway across country - you can’t have big gaps of time with sections of people with nothing to do
Chunks of time - could be semi structured - everyone has ability to suggest what can go in those chunks of time
Asking for agenda items - doesn’t get people excited - could we re-frame the question: what do you want out of this meeting?
are we talking “down” to the rest of the staff - give us your ideas
vs what do you want to get out of the meeting?
Even virtual - people don’t want to be talked at - and want more engaging together even in virtual arena
Informational Items (10 mins)
Allocations Stephen Deems
submitted report - May 8 and 9 review
Friday - PSC hosting ecosystem for research networking
feel free to look at slide they made
Suggest - fully subsidized by NSF - at no cost to you - not “free”
MATCH Shelley Knuth
practicing presentations for review - May 6-7
contacted resource providers for input - scheduling 1 on 1 meetings with them during in person meeting in Sep
supporting another workshop around workforce development
CONECT Tim Boerner
MMS Tom Furlani
as of 4/8 Pudue has not reported usage data on Anvil to the Allocations database since March 6. This impacts the usage reporting for Q1 2024
is being worked on
OpenCI John Towns
Report in last week
Update to PEP is in progress - that will be turned in before our review
DEI discussion with a facilitator and the PIs will be happening to discuss events from Quarterly meeting
Notification to group about this issue is being taken seriously and working to develop a positive outcome from issue
Anticipating EAB report in next week or two
Misc Topics:
Conversation about changing timeline for goals - reports are now in - should we discuss changing them
Should we make changes now so we are prepared for next year
Hinges on Eval working group - it would help if we knew when reports and reviews would happen - they are thinking of just making reports available on a set time schedule and not hinged on review dates - do reports two weeks before April 1-March 31
Parking Lot
Next EC Meeting: 16th April 2024
Action Tracker:
Use Action Item Macro to track assigned To Do Items - check the box when it is complete
Format:
Reference:
Risk Register: https://access-ci.atlassian.net/jira/core/projects/RR/board
Project Change Request: https://access-ci.atlassian.net/jira/core/projects/PCR/board