Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 6 Current »

Attendees:

  • Present: John Towns, Dina Meek, Tom Gulbransen, Lavanya Podila, Jay Alameda, Shawn Strande, Cindy Wong, Sharon Geva, Shannon Bradley, Kim Mann Bruch

Agenda/Notes

  1. Updates from NSF (5 minutes)

    1. Tom -

      1. PEP

      2. Quarterly project report - want to make sure it is settled

      3. NAIRR - could make us busier - waiting for more definition while not over committing

        1. maintain awareness of what we need to fix and be fixing them

        2. could possibly take on more work

        3. Pilot of a Pilot

        4. Community Driven Design

        5. Trustworthy AI - Model Development

          1. - transparency - data sharing - no sequestering

    2. Katie and everyone - talking about metrics being important

    3. Will move fast once it is organized - possibly next year

    4. https://www.nsf.gov/cise/national-ai.jsp

    5. https://www.ai.gov/nairrtf/

  2. What have we heard from stakeholders? (5 minutes)

  3. Area updates (10+ minutes)

    1. ACO

    2. Evaluation;

    3. Communications;

      1. Web

        1. WG - doing a sprint to help better direct newcomers to understand ACCESS and how to get started

        2. Science stories - Kim jumping right in with her first stories

      2. Newsletters

        1. Survey building underway; hoping to launch in Sept.

      3. Events

        1. PEARC - we have a list of opt-ins that we’ll be adding to our ACCESS Advance mailing lists

        2. SC - heavily engaged with creating content for our booth (videos, print materials, swag)

      4. Strategy - will restart Comms and CBE meetings with Jay and Kim

    4. Community Engagement;

      1. reworking Community Building and Engagement plan based on input received, will be working this with the CB&E group tomorrow

    5. Project Office;

    6. EAB

      1. Pulsed the EAB on having a Chair/Co-Chair. Consensus is it would be a good idea, though a couple members expressed concern about excess administrative work.

Next Meeting: 28th August 2023

  • No labels