Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 6 Next »

Attendees:

Present: John Towns, Dina Meek, Lavanya Podila, Kim Bruch, Cindy Wong, Shannon Bradley, Lisa Kaczmarczyk, Amitava Majumdar

Parking Lot:

Decisions made during the meeting:

Use Decision Macro


Agenda/Notes

  1. EC Meeting Debrief

    1. 2024-09-10 ACCESS EC Meeting Agenda & Summary - cancelled

  2. Review Action Items

ACO Easy Access Page -

https://access-ci.atlassian.net/jira/core/projects/ATT/list?sortBy=duedate&direction=ASC&themeState=dark%3Adark%20light%3Alight%20spacing%3Aspacing%20colorMode%3Alight&filter=status%20IN%20(%22In-Progress%22%2C%20%22To%20Do%22)


  1. Updates

    1. John Towns

      1. suggest retiring Risk RR-118 since this is associated with the work Lizanne was doing

      2. suggest retiring Risks RR-123, RR-124, and RR-144 since they are associated with discontinued efforts with respect to CB&E

    2. majumdar

      1. Sent email to NSF (Sharon, Tom) CCing John about promoting ACCESS to the community,

      2. Working with Cindy and John to be ACO rep to RAC

    3. Chuck P

    4. Cindy Wong

    5. Lavanya Podila

    6. Kimberly Mann Bruch

    7. Dina Meek

      1. Panel Review Grid - item 7: where did the “How to Handle” come from?

        1. This is the link Dina is talking about: https://access-ci.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/ACP/database/811466766

          1. Task: Create Communications Stories or metrics to track how ACCESS is contributing in practical ways to society to use for talking points when approaching non-traditional HPC communities.

          2. How to Handle: Suggest the ACCESS Communications Standing Committee consider spending some time distilling talking points from these stories to support those directly engaging with non-traditional HPC communities as well as others. Perhaps these talking points can be maintained on the ACCESS Communications Standing Committee wiki pages as a resource to any ACCESS staff member engaging members of non-traditional HPC communities. They could also be formatted into flyers for people to use at conferences. They could then be added to the website for easy access.

        2. The “How to Handle” came from the responses sent to NSF - this is pulled from the report:

        3. Recommendation 1.6: Showcasing how the science being enabled by ACCESS is contributing in
          practical ways to society would allow for talking points when approaching non-traditional HPC
          communities. Perhaps this could be done through metrics or communications stories.
          The ACO does highlight the impact of the science supported through science stories, events support,
          annual publications, and social media. This recommendation suggests the ACCESS Communications
          Standing Committee consider spending some time distilling talking points from these stories to
          support those directly engaging with non-traditional HPC communities as well as others. Perhaps
          these talking points can be maintained on the ACCESS Communications Standing Committee wiki
          pages as a resource to any ACCESS staff member engaging members of non-traditional HPC
          communities.

        4. The last part of the “How to Handle” came from Shannon - pulling in a comment made in a previous NSF meeting

          1. They could also be formatted into flyers for people to use at conferences. They could then be added to the website for easy access.

    8. Shannon Bradley

      1. Sandbox - Onboarding Offboarding

Next Meeting: 18th September 2024


Reference

ACO Weekly Updates

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1FFGMv7qdoKtHMy_zyyjFLdBMVmCDJY6QDGXSxp_988I/edit#gid=0

  • No labels