Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

\uD83D\uDC65 Participants

  • Lead: Shawn Strande

  • John Towns, Shelley Knuth, Julie Ma, Leslie Froeschl, Tom Gulbranson, Winona Snapp-Childs, Laura Herriott, Stephen Deems, Dina Meek,

\uD83E\uDD45 Topics

  • External Advisory Group Board Coordination & Optimization

    Catalog, review, and consolidate, where possible, external advisory groups among Tracks

    • Slides presented during session

    • Are Service Tracks planning external advisory group, e.g., User Advisory?

    • ACO is required to facilitate an ACCESS-wide EAB; what cross-track areas to focus on?

    • PEARC is an opportunity to let the community know we will have an EAB. The EAB Charter will likely not be complete/approved by then, but we could let folks know to look out for a call for nominations.

    • Do folks want to start looking at the draft EAB charter even though formal review and feedback won’t be for a while?

    • EAB members will be approved by EC.

    • The EAB competency matrix is meant to cover all competencies deemed important. Request is to send competency additions to be considered,

      • Tom G. suggested that marketing be added to the competency list.

    • The number of EAB members and duration will be determined via the EAB charter

    • Multiple tracks are looking to include an advisory board and there is a heavy overlap in competencies. There may be a way to have sub-committees for track specific.

      • Track 1 is interested in coordinating/tiering advisory boards (Representative: Laura Herriott)

      • Track 2 (user advisory committee?) (Representative: Shelley Knuth)

      • Track 3 will have security council comprised of representatives from each track and RPs

      • Track 4

      • ACO representative is Shawn Strande

    • Younger researchers (grad/post-grad students) should be represented in the EAB. Maybe add this as a competency in the matrix.

    • Tom G: Important mindset is inverting the mindset of “bringing people into ACCESS” to “embed ACCESS in communities”

    • Emerging communities/institutions should also be included in the competency list.

    • Stakeholder type should be included. e.g. industry, government labs, etc. should be represented

      • International participation would bring useful perspectives

    • The orientation of committee members is very important

      • XSEDE’s recorded program presentations (4 hrs) was very helpful to XAB, new staff, etc.

  • Community building and engagement contacts

    • Who will be the contacts from each track to participate in the community building and engagement coordination meetings?

...

  •  All tracks asked to send to Community building and engagement contacts to ACO
  •  Shawn Strande to work with all group representative of all tracks to define/redefine the advisory board structure in a coordinated manner (Shawn Strande)
  •  

⤴ Decisions