Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 3 Next »

Attendees:

John Towns, Dina Meek, Tom Gulbransen, Lavanya Podila, Shawn Strande, Cindy Wong, Sharon Geva, Kim Mann Bruch, Shannon Bradley

Decisions made during the meeting:

    Use Decision Macro


Agenda/Notes

  1. Updates from NSF (5 minutes)

    1. They are open to hearing about what parts of the review were helpful, what were inefficient

    2. Tom: Seemed like review process was very consuming - they don’t want it to be distracting from what we should be doing

    3. Open to suggestions

      1. Discussed other options

      2. Separate evaluations leads to interpretation that we are less integrated than we are

      3. There would be more interaction between teams if we had a consolidated review of some kind

    4. Suggestion from Tom - What if NSF was to take an outcome that is part of the program - and review that topic as a whole across all teams?

    5. Panel review is helpful because panel does provide advice - but the advice is related to what was presented to them

    6. Ask the panelists their opinion of what they would want to ask of the entire team - and then they could create more informed feedback

  2. What have we heard from stakeholders? (5 minutes)

    1. Quarterly Meeting last week

      1. Winona presented the RP survey to the RP meeting

    2. Questionnaire about Quarterly Meeting will be going out - will report on survey next week

      1. informal feedback is good

  3. PY3 Quarterly Meeting Supplement (10 minutes)

    1. Do we want to ask for a supplement? Lavanya would like to start the process if so

    2. Will NSF entertain a proposal?

    3. Sharon - it would be good to see how the meetings went - some kind of quantitative analysis on how effective in person ones are in comparison with the Virtual one we just had. How we have learned to make the in person ones better. Will it be just leadership or whole team? This will all need to be discussed.

      1. Could EC give a tradeo

  4. Area updates (10+ minutes)

    1. ACO

      1. Team working on responses to panel report

    2. Evaluation

    3. Communications

      1. Revised newsletters - should roll out late this month/early next

      2. PY2 highlights book - Dina reviewed in layout; should be coming to the EC this week

    4. Project Office

      1. Prep underway for ACCESS Booth at PEARC

    5. EAB


  5. Misc:

    1. Review To Do Tasks for NSF Meetings

Task report

Looking good, no incomplete tasks.

Parking Lot

Next Meeting: 17th June 2024


Action Tracker:

Use Action Item Macro to track assigned To Do Items - check the box when it is complete

Format:

  • No labels