Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 5 Next »

\uD83D\uDDD3 Date

\uD83D\uDC65 Participants

Dina Meek Andrew Helregel Megan Johnson Megan Janeski Alana.Romanella Bob DeLeon Leslie Froeschl Hannah Naughton Cindy Wong

\uD83E\uDD45 Goals

  • Possible shift in messaging of ACCESS program from "who we are, how we are organized" to "what ACCESS means to you as a..." for each stakeholder group Tom Gulbransen (15 minutes)

    1. We are past the point where we describe who we are and we need to change the narrative to “What does it mean to use ACCESS for each stakeholder group (for instance, as an RP, or a campus champion etc.

\uD83D\uDDE3 Discussion topics

Item

Presenter

Notes

SC22

Dina

Booth Volunteer Survey Results: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1RCAuocHz8t6Lkn8f5iJuX-0vdWVfT3BuF-VxZTda_uM/edit?usp=sharing

Social Media

Andrew

November metrics

Website

Cynthia/Meggie

Web stories update -

  • Call for January stories - what do constituents need to know now:

    • Allocations

    • Support

    • Operations

    • Metrics

Newsletters

Hannah

Newsletter update

Brand

Dina

  • Websites style guide update

  • ACCESS on Demand branding update

Misc.

✅ Action items

⤴ Decisions

  • No labels