\uD83D\uDC65 Participants
Lead: Lizanne DeStefano
All meeting attendees
\uD83E\uDD45 Topics
Identify evaluators for each proposal
Track 1 - Dave Hart
proposal has table in proposal that have goals
Track 2 - Shelley Knuth
evaluation plans not defined yet
Track 3 - Winona Snapp-Childs
evaluation activities are included in proposal
Track 4 - Tom Furlani
evaluation activities are included in proposal
ACO - Lizanne DeStefano
contracting with an external evaluator (Lisa Kaczmarczyk)
Obtaining track evaluation plans
Develop a matrix that compares metrics, instruments, data collection and reporting timelines
It is assumed that each track has an evaluation component, the defined or undefined evaluation needs will be discussed in the first 90 days.
XSEDE Evaluation data, tools, methods, etc. available to all tracks for reference and/or to assist with ACCESS evaluation
All XSEDE evaluation reports are available, and can be reviewed to understand what has been done over the last 11 years.
Coordinated User Survey
All tracks have a need or would like to get pull information from user surveys.
There should be a user survey that is at a program-level (meta data collection) to make sure the collaboration between the tracks are working for the community. The separation of services (service tracks) should be transparent. We need to make sure that we do not induce confusion in the research community by asking focused questions focused on tracks vs services.
The EC must approve any combined evaluation plan, including coordinated user surveys
NSF site visits
No decisions have been made on site visits. Tentative plan is for each track to have individual site visits.
✅ Action items (Owner)
- Tracks to provide Evaluation Plan to ACO Evaluation team for coordination to create the Evaluation Matrix (Track PIs)
- Discuss access to all proposals for evaluation information. (John T)