Versions Compared

Old Version 1

changes.mady.by.user Dina Meek

Saved on

compared with

New Version 2

changes.mady.by.user Dina Meek

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

\uD83D\uDC65 Participants

...

  • Matt)

  • Style Guide - from the agency

  • Analytics 

    • status update?

    • Dina needs to give Q the emails of all our development teams

  • Universal footer navigation

    • Privacy Policy

    • Conduct (J. Towns working on)

    • Acceptable Use (created by the IAM group)

    • Dina to bring Support's Privacy, Code of Conduct to ACO to determine if we can use this, make adjustments etc.

      • Then bring back to the group to make sure we all have the same verbiage/links in our footers

  • Resource Provider Page - JP, Julie, Greg, Nathan, ACO - Ron/Q

    • Q did a very high-level layout based on JP’s team’s outline

    • We need to run by a small focus group of RPs before we do much more

      • We need to determine what makes the most sense to show on the page - the Resource Provider names or the actual resources (Bridges) page

      • We may need to link off to a subdomain that has a list (dynamic pulling from dbase)

    • Accessibility

  • User Interface

  • Measurements

    • Status update

      • of all the resources

    • Draft copy

      • Group discussed purpose of page

        • we all agree that this is to make the RPs more visible

        • The questions at the bottom are how people take action

          • The various service areas need to help us determine what the questions are and what the links are

        • The Resource Types will be done away with and that info will be brought up into both the intro (explaining the different types of resource) and then fleshing that out a bit under the blurb that will come under whatever the “levels” title becomes

      • Vet through RP forum

        • NEXT STEPS: ACO will share updated draft copy based on above with this group for feedback before giving to Q to re-lay out

        • Once team is satisfied with copy and layout, Dina and Ron will bring to the RP Forum small focus group

For future:

  • User Interface

    • Refinements focusing especially on:

    • Universal navigation dropdown (Login or My ACCESS TBD for future)

      • Do we want dropdowns

        • open on hover? open on click?

        • what do underlines mean? Active?

      • Q says its most simple to use “Login” on all the sites in the Univ nav bar

      • All sites aren’t handling login the same;

      • where we need all sites to go is to CiLogon

      • We will defer this piece - for the ACO site - until we’ve got style guide finished

    • Subdomain navigation and drop downs

      • Subdomain footer refinements

    • Andrew: you could notate a PDF or use XD

    • Breadcrumbs

      • “Home” means different things

      • So replace that in breadcrumbs with subdomain name

      • “Home/Tools” would change, for ex, to “Support/Tools”

    • Would like to add a style - like the inpage navigation (see “Tools” in Q’s layout) - for inpage content boxes

    • Julie proposes we need to make hard decisions on how things should look and function so as not to confuse users

      • Q will look at this and see what makes the most sense

New Business

  • Subgroup updates

    • Header & Footer - Nathan, Andrew, Greg, Ron/Dina, JP/Dinuka

      • Low hanging fruit was the focus

        • identified things in header/font/spacings/footer and deciding which track had the best look

        • each service area should try to get this done in the next week or so (early Feb)

        • Group agrees we should have a universal footer (the white area) but also some of the same elements in the green bar area

          • And, should we identify that green bar section (with the specific subdomain navigation) with what navigation they are looking at, i.e. “Allocations”

    • Resource Provider Page - JP, Julie, Greg, Nathan, ACO - Ron/Q

      Next steps:

    • Review with Q

      • Q did a very high-level layout based on JP’s team’s outline

      • We need to run by a small focus group of RPs before we do much more

        • We need to determine what makes the most sense to show on the page - the Resource Provider names or the actual resources (Bridges) page

        • We may need to link off to a subdomain that has a list (dynamic pulling from dbase) of all the resources

    • Draft copy

      • ACO; bring back to group

      • Vet through RP forum

      • Bring to Q for design

  • And…

    • Adding blurb to Contact page with link to ticketing system for allocated users

      • Dina shared text with Q 2/8

    • Universal navigation, dropdown menu for “About”, includes file distribution to all
      subdomains via GitHub

      • Determine if there should be dropdowns

...