Page Comparison

SC22

Dina

Booth Volunteer Survey Results: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1RCAuocHz8t6Lkn8f5iJuX-0vdWVfT3BuF-VxZTda_uM/edit?usp=sharing

Social Media

Andrew

November metrics

• 14k impressions v. our 10k monthly goal

  • much thanks to SC campaign

Website

Cynthia/Meggie

Web stories update -

• Call for January stories - what do constituents need to know now:

  • Allocations - Waiting on privacy policy before sharing too much about data

  • Support - Pegasus is good to start with

  • Operations - STEP program recruitment is the big thing

  • Metrics -

Newsletters

Hannah

Newsletter update

• ACCESS Advance - OR = 33% (avg); CTR = .6% (below avg)

  • science story, training,

    • Comments - training & events information

• Inside ACCESS - OR = 54%; CTR = not as many opportunities for clicking through

  • Most CTs were about STEP

Brand

Dina

• Websites style guide update

• ACCESS on Demand branding update

Misc.

Deems

(Time permitting)

• ACCESS “Portable” Presentation

  • Could we work toward pulling together a quick slide deck, presentation (perhaps a recording of) to disseminate to ACCESS partner sites/RP sites to help evangelize on their local campus?

    • Stephen is being asked to present on ACCESS across CMU/Pitt and it could help us further our reach by creating something portable and digestible for others to talk about with their collaborators.

• How can we start engaging with other NSF programs?

  • This might be more “Outreach” than comms, (e.g. CyberTraining, CC*, CSSI, AI Institutes, etc.)

• Further the impact of our newsletters

  • So much good content is coming out, how can we cross-promote with other consortia/groups?

  • Stephen funnels some updates to NIH projects he’s involved in, and also shares updates with Slack spaces at PSC.