2026-01-20 - ACCESS EC Meeting Agenda & Summary

2026-01-20 - ACCESS EC Meeting Agenda & Summary

Attendees:

  • RAMPS/Allocations: Bruno Abreu (v), Rob Light, Ken Hackworth, Nathan Tolbert

  • MATCH/Support: Shelley Knuth (v), Alana Romanella, Jim Griffioen

  • CONECT/Operations: Tim Boerner (v), Leslie Froeschl

  • MMS/Metrics: Tom Furlani (v), Joe White

  • RP: Eric Adams (v), Virginia Trueheart

  • EAB: Chuck Pavloski

  • OpenCI/ACO: John Towns (v), Amit Majumdar, Misha Shah, Lisa Kaczmarczyk, Shannon Bradley

  • NSF: Sharon Geva, Ed Walker

  • Speaker: Cindy Wong

Parking Lot

  • Fill EAB spot vacated by Vivian HuangFu

  • Misha will not be able to attend the 1/27/2026 meeting


Decisions made during the meeting:

Use Decision Macro - Tool (under Insert Elements in the toolbar)

Agenda


Consent Agenda - Updates for the team that should be completed/read offline

If possible, please fill in this info prior to the meeting - thank you!

  1. Consent Agenda - @Tom Furlani (5 mins)

    1. Approval of summaries from prior EC meeting - https://access-ci.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/ACP/pages/1868759041

  2. Informational Items

  3. Allocations - @Bruno Abreu

    1. no updates

    2. situational awareness - division of tasks is complete, quarterly report was a nice way to get familiar with the team

  4. Support - @Shelley Knuth /Alana/Jim

    1. heading to USC tomorrow

  5. Operations Tim/Leslie

    1. no updates

  6. Metrics @Tom Furlani @Joseph White

    1. no updates

  7. RP Forum @Eric Adams (RCAC) @Virginia Trueheart

    1. Vice Chair Election Results - Virginia is co-chair officially

  8. EAB @Chuck P

    1. updates below

  9. ACO @John Towns

    1. Quarterly Report submitted

    2. Evaluation activity during quarterly meeting - paragraph writeups - Lisa presenting

      1. Plan:  A group based self evaluation of the functioning of the Executive Council over the past 4 years with the purpose of surfacing and capturing successes, challenges and lessons learned. Topics of discussion will  include:  how the EC has evolved over time, what operational structures and behaviors have worked well, which have worked less well, approaches to decision making and delegation,  recommendations for the current or future EC with similar structure. Areas where individual EC members hold divergent perspectives will be noted as well as areas where there is full agreement. All reasonable efforts will be made to maintain the confidentiality of individual EC member comments when it comes to reporting the findings from this meeting.

      2. Outcomes: A list of Lessons Learned that the EC is willing to share with the NSF verbally and in the Evaluator’s Annual Report.  
        Audience for Lessons Learned: NSF personnel. There are currently no plans to share the Lessons Learned more broadly. Any future dissemination of Lessons Learned is at the discretion of the EC and NSF.
        As stated above, all discussion during this meeting will remain confidential. The only items that will be shared outside the meeting are the Lessons Learned that everyone present agrees upon.
        No formal preparation is required prior to the meeting. It would be helpful if each member of the EC thinks a bit about the discussion topic in advance of our gathering.
        Other Information: We will not be conducting any additional interviews outside of this discussion because of the inherent challenge of maintaining individual confidentiality.

      3. List of lessons learned

      4. Audience is NSF personnel - no wider plans

      5. Discussion will remain confidential

      6. Please think about this before the meeting

  10. NSF - Sharon and Ed -

    1. no updates

  11. Standing Committee Updates - EC Liaison - (Chuck lead)

    1. SC/WG Coordination - all current SCs are scheduled for this cycle

    2. Communications Standing Committee

      1. no report

    3. Cybersecurity Standing Committee

      1. Has not met since last EC meeting

    4. Evaluation Standing Committee

      1. no report

    5. Infrastructure Standing Committee

      1. no report

    6. Ticketing Standing Committee

      1. Reporting today as part the agenda - no one showed - will need to be rescheduled for next week

    7. Web Presence Standing Committee

      1. no report

    8. Data Architecture WG (Proposed)

      1. no report

  12. Milestone Review: (Link Below)
    75 and 70 have been updated - they are good to go

    image-20260120-145448.png
  13. EC Meeting To Do / Follow Ups: (Link Below)
    - is ATT-215 complete? we cannot use grant funds as a sponsor - John has been using ACO/ICR funds for this - Tom will ask on his side - John believes it was $5000
    For PEARC25, ACCESS had a Gold level exhibitor presence.  $10,500

    image-20260120-145619.png
  14. Reminders

    1. don't forget to review Engagement Tracker and Risk Register Review

      1. Upcoming Meetings & Events (ACCESS Engagement Tracker )

      2. https://access-ci.atlassian.net/jira/core/projects/RR/list?sortBy=assignee&direction=DESC&filter=status%20in%20(%22Execute%20Contingency%22%2C%20Monitor%2C%20Review)

    2. create a ticket if you have anyone onboarding or offboarding and need access permissions set properly


Additional Agenda Items

  1. Update on the Agenda for the February Quarterly Meeting - Cindy

    1. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/18CkNXNN-l2JIsSK4ZTecj6G6rSa4AKeIxwhJwjqQv_U/edit?usp=sharing - input deadline this Friday, Jan. 23

    2. We currently have a little less than a day’s content

    3. Please encourage staff to contribute more ideas

    4. Committee: Bruno, Shannon, Becky, Cindy, Misha, Aaron, Amit, Cindy

    5. We meet again next Monday - hope to have something to show EC by next Tuesday

  2. Standing Committee Reports

    1. Ticketing SC (Winona) - moved to next week

  3. EAB - Chuck Pavloski

    1. Nominee presentation will be at the next EC meeting (1/27) with information sent to EC in advance

    2. Still need RAC appointment to the EAB

  4. ACCESS Training from PSC and rules with international participants - Chuck

    1. In discussion with Tom Maiden at PSC, I need some guidance as to how we can do (or even if it possible) on an international educational/research partner taking PSC/ACCESS training courses.

      1. especially the interactive part of the training

    2. This is an NSF question

      1. We have been given guidelines for ACCESS

      2. Operations and Allocations are keeping up with that

      3. Does it align with our current policies?

      4. If there are new guidelines we will be given them - but for now follow

    3. They can sit in on the instructional part - use materials on their own systems

    4. Are these trainings part of ACCESS or part of a different grant? If part of a different grant - they need to talk to their program officer

    5. The resources they run the trainings on is an ACCESS resource

    6. We have established the boundaries around that - if you are solely at an international institution we cannot have you on our resources

    7. If the people in the trainings have to get on the ACCESS resource - we can’t give them access - an allocation is an allocation

    8. The training is not an ACCESS training - they might be able to participate in the training

  5. Finalize Shared Priorities

    1. Shared priority slides - new text is in red 122325_ACCESS_PY5 Shared Priorities.pptx

      1. Each team add supplemental slides containing greater detail on their contributions to the 4 shared priorities

      2. John - please enter the genesis of why we are doing things this way

Next Meeting: January 27, 2026

 

LINKS

Program Milestones

 

EC Meeting Task Tracking + Quarterly and Annual Meetings To Do Follow Ups


Reference:

Risk Register:

Project Change Request: