2025-10-28 - ACCESS EC Meeting Agenda & Summary
Attendees:
RAMPS: Stephen Deems (v), Dave Hart
MATCH: Shelley Knuth (v), Alana Romanella, Jim Griffioen
CONECT: Tim Boerner (v), Leslie Froeschl
MMS: Tom Furlani (v), Joe White
RP: Eric Adams (v), Virginia Trueheart
EAB: Chuck Pavloski
OpenCI: John Towns (v), Amit Majumdar, Misha Shah, Lisa Kaczmarczyk, Shannon Bradley
NSF: Sharon Geva, Ed Walker
Parking Lot
Fall Events to be aware of: Shelley’s and John’s calendars
October 28 (Shelley at Educause)
November 4 (John at Chicago Quantum Summit)
November 18 (SC; anticipate EC meeting is cancelled)
Shannon will be out of office Oct 28 (Science Gateways) and Nov 4 (vacation)
Decisions made during the meeting:
Use Decision Macro - Tool (under Insert Elements in the toolbar)
Agenda
Consent Agenda @Shelley Knuth (5 mins)
Approval of summaries from prior EC meeting - https://access-ci.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/ACP/pages/1662812173
Informational Items
Allocations @Stephen Deems (Unlicensed)
Starting discussions about ACCESS-wide planning (in preparation for EC+ Meeting) this week
Working on updating milestones for current endeavors
MATCH @Shelley Knuth /Alana/Jim
CONECT @Tim Boerner /Leslie
The Infrastructure Expansion Standing Committee is proposing new terminology regarding various levels of ACCESS resource providers be adopted. Please review these terms and be prepared to discuss/accept next week: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RDKiMNApaBdBOaRJN0S1H9ZEPYVZku7w4bhnVt-4vtk/edit?tab=t.0
Operations plans to post a new application form for non-ACSS resources who would like to apply to be an ACCESS RP. Please review and be prepared to discuss/accept next week: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1GqxtRgpZMf9NYw-rgV1HMICMDx-lTyNGmynOU4jMaOE/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.2bhah4a9j2f0
MMS @Tom Furlani @Tom Furlani (Unlicensed)
RP @Eric Adams (RCAC)
EAB @Chuck P
EAB-EC discussions continued (today, see below)
OpenCI @John Towns
NSF - Sharon and Ed -
Standing Committee Updates - EC Liason - (Chuck lead)
Communications Standing Committee
no report
Cybersecurity Standing Committee
did not meet since last EC meeting
Evaluation Standing Committee
no report
Infrastructure Standing Committee
no report
Ticketing Standing Committee
no report
Web Presence Standing Committee
no report
Milestone Review: (Link Below)
EC Meeting To Do / Follow Ups: (Link Below)
Reminders
Remember to keep working on the NSF Takeaways: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1XM99UYF0hW6y-_hFWoyALjlhhmWlIhhJYrfWgnn0M9E/edit?tab=t.0
Upcoming Meetings & Events (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1_EXKUOXmY-TVkDWaHR1-SuiKt404uGEnGSr6uQCkwzw/edit?gid=0#gid=0 )
Additional Agenda Items
NSF Update - (0 minutes) Sharon and Ed - NSF in shutdown mode
EAB Recommendations Discussion (20 mins ) - Chuck
Discussion docs: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WAr43P00MuvLkyC7WZsY_ElzBe7tBEl_rbQPu087d5o/edit?usp=sharing
New interventions/initiatives proposed by the PI’s help for phase 2 or whatever comes next after ACCESS? It will be great to see some planning FY 4 and 5 and beyond.
Overview of Quarterly Meeting To Do Items/Follow Ups - Need: what are we following up on in PY5
Meeting Summary - https://access-ci.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/ACP/pages/1623326722
Trend Analysis Information - past 20 years - https://access-ci.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/ACP/pages/1623851010
Data Informed Decisions List - https://access-ci.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/ACP/pages/1623457796
Lessons Learned (hand written notes)
it does work best to have a central computer with all the power points in one spot instead of swapping laptops at the presenter podium (would have been easier if we had access to our regular Google Drive)
Hosting center should provide either a spare laptop or have AV technicians who operate a primary computer and control the presentations
Aim for more interactive sessions and demos if we can
Actions: (hand written notes) need target dates - EC will collate action items
Should we survey each institution and find out what is approved - and make a list of the approved tools and find out where we intersect and use that to make the policy.
How should we make the data we create (data exercise) and have on individual teams available to all teams
make a catalog of this data: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LMz6TBbTUsLnOzK5jkHYNZrDR0aS_d7eyrhX9O6XmO8/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.7xo6cly8tp8
make sure all action items are captured from the
Cindy - agenda planning committee
Call for new members
Current team has been involved for many meetings - we need new people
Laura H - starting new form of RAC
New people will be starting this fall
Looking for topics for the agenda - what would you like to know from the researcher perspective- you would have about 20 mins with Q&A
Fall Virtual Quarterly Meeting - (5 minutes) Misha
Overview of the Dec 11 meeting purpose – shifting from individual team plans to collaborative planning focused on shared ACCESS goals and metrics.
Emphasis on alignment, cross-team coordination, and defining PY5 priorities collectively.
Introduction of a new asynchronous pre-work process via email
EC Meeting Task Tracking + Quarterly and Annual Meetings To Do Follow Ups
Misc Topics:
Meeting Summary generated by AI - May contain inaccuracies
Meeting summary
Quick recap
The team discussed various updates including milestone tracking, quarterly reports, and the need for improved communication with NSF. They reviewed outreach activities and engagement strategies with regional organizations, agreeing to formalize their communications approach and position NAR relative to ACCESS while staying within their scope. The conversation ended with discussions about handling EAB questions and planning for future initiatives, including preparation for the upcoming quarterly meeting.
Next steps
Leslie/Tim's team: Remind people later this week to look at materials before next week's meeting
Chuck: Continue to pester standing committee leads for reports
Misha/Shannon: Close the milestone for "make counter invite for December forwarding meeting"
All team members: Keep the engagement tracker up to date
ACO : Look at how to leverage communications channels of other organizations
Stephen: Find and share link to communications plan document in the EAB discussion doc
Chuck: Draft response to EAB recommendations and share with group for approval before sending
Tom and team: Review quarterly meeting action items and identify top priorities to assign owners
EC: Assign individual owners for top priority action items from quarterly meeting
Misha: Send out pre-work email with specific prompts to prepare for next quarterly meeting
Misha: Share draft agenda for quarterly meeting for team review
Summary
Project Updates and Action Items
Chuck led a meeting to discuss various updates and action items. Tim was reminded to follow up with his team about reviewing certain items before the next meeting. John mentioned that their quarterly report was completed. Chuck noted that there were no updates from NSF and requested standing committee leads to improve communication. The team reviewed milestone tracking, noting that one item was completed. They discussed the need to continue working on NSF takeaways and keep the engagement tracker up to date. Chuck then began reviewing the EMB recommendations, focusing on outreach activities and interactions with other regional computing working groups and conferences.
Formalizing Regional Communications Strategy
The team discussed their informal engagement with regional organizations like CASC and CARC, with John noting these activities were already being tracked in the access engagements tracker. They agreed to formalize their communications strategy by having the comms team leverage other organizations' mailing lists to expand their reach, with Amit taking this as an action item. The group also addressed concerns about how to position NAR relative to ACCESS, with Tom confirming that while they could develop insights on integration, this wasn't a current priority.
EAB Integration Strategy Discussion
The team discussed how to handle questions from the EAB about NAR and Access integration, agreeing to stay out of scope and focus on common infrastructure and future agility. They decided to frame their response positively, emphasizing that such decisions are for NSF, not for them. The group also touched on the need to identify key capabilities developed through Access and lessons learned from the exceed to access transition, though they did not reach a final conclusion on how to present these findings.
Future Planning and Meeting Preparation
The EC discussed two main topics: a response to a comment about creating a list of achievements and a future planning initiative. They agreed to thank the commenter and acknowledge this as a future consideration, while maintaining that detailed planning for years beyond 5 is out of scope. Misha outlined plans for the upcoming quarterly meeting, emphasizing a more collaborative approach and the need for pre-meeting preparation, which will be communicated via a draft agenda and prompts for individual reflection.
Reference:
Risk Register:
Project Change Request: