Page Comparison

Agenda/Notes

1. Updates from NSF (5 minutes)

2. What have we heard from stakeholders? (5 minutes)

3. Discuss ideas for shared part of the annual review

   1. how to engage other tracks and share the presentations for the review

   2. Common Subjects

      1. Summary of where we are now

      2. Sub awards now

      3. Discussion of program wide goals and metrics in relation to those

   3. Tom requests

      1. Detail inside measurable details

      2. highlight those outcomes archived thru contributions of multiple awardees

      3. How is the program working - how are those that are group team contributed to going

   4. When each team comes and says - we were working with Group X … and then another team says they are working with group X --- why didn’t the presentation indicate the collaboration across the 3

      1. highlight these successes

      2. Standing committees are an example of this

   5. Each team has common slides - program wide goals listed

      1. each team talks about their contribution to those program wide goals

   6. How is this detailed in the review?

      1. model - same slides for A - G

      2. model - same slides A - detail, B - detail, C - Detail

      3. model - same slides A - G - and full detail goes below

      4. give to teams - and let EC decide how to tell story

   7. How long is the slot for the combined presentation - it will change for each team

   8. Dates for Reviews?

      1. we think around April

      2. NSF has black out dates only at this point - let them know any of our blackout dates (see task below)

      3. 2 days back to back hopefully

      4. They have travel in April as well

4. Locking in changes to the PEP re: CB&E

   1. Reallocation of budget and place in a project change request

      1. how to use comms support

      2. reallocation of people

      3. support of evaluation working group

   2. Timeline

      1. due before annual review - so the change can be included

      2. Goal - have it completed by end of March

   3. PEP will change due to change in scope

      1. show splitting apart of tasks and who is doing what across tracks

   4. Subaward amendment to SDSC which will document some of the changes

   5. If there is a greater demand for the ACO in the future - we would like to know now

      1. there is nothing definitively enough about what to do with CB&E now

      2. we shouldn’t wait

   6. We can also include financial updates in our next IPR

5. Interim Progress Report - and our new layout

   1. No longer have challenges and solutions section - did we have any?

      1. we have them in each area instead of aggregated

      2. this allows us to provide more detail about what we did about the challenge

   2. Things like metrics / KPIs - if we can flag anything that is new or changes to what has been done before - that would help

      1. we will flag if we add, remove, or change how we are evaluating a metric

6. Area updates (10+ minutes)

   1. ACO;

   2. Evaluation; - Shawn

   3. Communications; - Dina

   4. Community Engagement; - Jay

   5. Project Office;

   6. EAB;

7. Misc:

   1. Review To Do Tasks for NSF Meetings