Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Dina Meek Andrew Helregel Megan Johnson Megan Janeski Alana.Romanella Hannah Naughton Cindy Wong Cynthia Dillon (Unlicensed) Stephen Deems Leslie Froeschl Stephen Deems Bob DeLeon

\uD83E\uDD45 Goals

Item

Presenter

Notes

Social Media

Andrew

January Metrics

Website

Cynthia/Meggie

Dina

Web stories update updates

Web Presence Working Group Update

  • Working on Style Guide, Resource Provider Page and Header/Footer alignments

Newsletters

Hannah

Follow-up discussion from Constant Contact training

  • we need to work with each service area to assess:

    • what types of emails they will be sending from CC

    • how frequently those emails will be sent

    • who those emails will go to

    • how those emails will be collected and maintained in appropriate lists

  • we need to get ACCESS user emails into Constant Contact

    / Emails

    Group

    The team completed our sprint to address communicating via email in a coordinated way.

    • We used this document (originally drafted by S. Deems) as our starting point

    • Next Steps:

      • Team to finalize their parts of the document by 2/16

      • Dina Meek to clean up document (creating multiple documents if needed) and report to EC and add it to this team’s wiki

      • Hannah created an email list w/in Constant Contact which should be added to all communications (aside from Inside ACCESS which we all already receive) so that we are aware of each service area’s email communications.

      • Hannah Naughton will flesh out the sub-wiki page to accommodate all known newsletters; team will link each communication to the appropriate table in the sub-wiki for quick reference of all our communications

    Discuss/approve criteria for external content in quarterly ACCESS Advance newsletter

    We will send out an all-ACCESS email explaining how we are handling and working on this

    Brand

    DinaACCESS Writing Style Guide

    Misc.

    Dina/Stephen

    Similar to Hannah’s criteria above, we need to prioritize email criteria. I put together a rough draft with what the various awardees need to discuss so we can open the email pipes.

    Would each of you, representing the service areas/tracks, be open to 1:1 meetings with us once a month?

    For 2/9 Meeting: Assignment: Develop elevator pitches (to be used by your leadership and other team members):

    Example for RAMPS: 

    "Allocation Services interfaces with the research community to facilitate requests looking to utilize advanced cyberinfrastructure provided by the NSF. RAMPS is  Allocation Services provides an open, inviting, and democratized allocations marketplace for to easily request a range of novel resources to empower all research communities with a simplified request and review framework through a flexible software environment."."

    ACCESS Operations supports the integration and operation of ACCESS cyberinfrastructure with operational support, networking and data services, and cybersecurity support. We also support the nation’s resource providers and strive to grow the national cyberinfrastructure ecosystem by integrating new kinds of resources into the community.

    Dina

    Terminology Task Force adoption

    ...