Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  • Add comment here…

  • (Deems) Meta Comment about Personas: Instead of “I’m a…” consider rephrasing to “For…” (e.g. “For Researchers”, “For Graduate Students”, “For Educators”

    • this would play off nicely with “ACCESS For…(insert persona)”

  • (Deems) The “What’s next?” section looks a little funky in boxes. Can we make these a list with drop-downs for more information?

    • I think my general comment is: “there’s a lot of info in this page, and we might be able to organize better.”

  • (Hart) It leads with a link to the About ACCESS FAQ page, followed by a repeat (with a different look) of the persona links, THEN, three steps to get started, PLUS six possible (unnumbered) followup actions (several with multiple links). It feels like this page can't commit to what it wants to be or do. Furthermore, much of the Get Started page and the About ACCESS page FAQ seem to primarily target Researchers. So the new For Researchers page seems to add another layer of uncertainty. Which page should Researchers *really* start with?  The About ACCESS page could just be a standard text page, mainly with the answers to the first of the two questions there. The other questions should be moved to the most appropriate persona pages. So "About ACCESS" would no longer be an FAQ page. For the Get Started page, I'd omit the boxes for the personas here. I'd also try to structure the page consistently as steps 1-6. Keep steps 1-3 but turn the "What's Next" boxes into steps 4-6 somehow.

...

FOR RESEARCHERS

https://access.qltddev.com/get-started/for-researchers/

  • Add comment here…

  • (Deems) Considering adding “available through ACCESS” to the opening sentence: “Computational researchers of all experience levels use advanced computational resources available through ACCESS to take their research to the next level.

  • (Hart - for all non-RP persona pages)Each starts with a "content-free" sentence, then pushes again the About ACCESS FAQ, then a set of Quick Links, then — if you scroll far enough — a different set of FAQs. E.g., three handfuls of spaghetti hoping we'll get something that sticks. The Quick Links on each persona pages, should be turned into Qs for the FAQ lists, if they're not already there. So, just one FAQ list for each persona.

...

FOR EDUCATORS

https://access.qltddev.com/get-started/for-educators/

...

  • Add comment here…

  • (Deems) Insert links to the Integration Roadmaps documentation?

  • (Hart) I will add that "explore why become an RP" doesn't seem grammatically correct. And even nit-pickier, in the box at right, the apostrophe in "I'm a Resource Provider" is backwards.

...

FOR PROGRAMS & ORGANIZATIONS

...