Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  • Evaluation Committee - Discussion of ACCESS annual survey results - Dr. Winona Snapp-Childs

    • Range of responses ( ranges 1-5) low response rate (only 8 responses)

    • recommendationsRecommendations from RP Forum: (to address low response rate)

      • Surveys sent to PIs and integration coordinators

      .
      • , which may have caused confusion as to who should respond and how many responses were expected

        • Tell RPs that you want mult. responses 1 from PI and 1 from coordination for different perspective

        • Recommend multiple surveys to be filled out by responsible parties at RPs: one specific to PIs, 1 for integration coordinator

        • Include additional staff on response list: user support: tech lead, etc.

          • Push back from Committee: Can Requesing RPs coordinate on their own to provide a joint response so that evaluation committee does not have to create mult. surveys for different staff ‘types’.

    • What are outcomes

      • IN response ACCESS to setup meeting in Boston to address …..

      • Evaluation committee will eventually provide report with RPs, but due to low response rate want to be careful

      • EC team would like recommendations from Evaluation committee based on report

      • (Stephens view) EC team will disseminate to RPs and provide recommendation action plan.

      • the individual leads or PI should response based on results.

    • Missing questions?

  • Brief allocations update (Standing agenda item) - Rob or Nathan from Allocations (if present and needed)

  • Open floor RP Q&A or issue discussion

...