Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Attendees:

  • John Towns

  • Dina Meek

  • Tom Gulbransen

  • Lavanya Podila

  • Jay Alameda

  • Shawn Strande

  • Cindy Wong

  • Sharon Geva

  • Kim Mann Bruch

  • Shannon Bradley

Expand
titleAttendance

Name

9/11

9/18

9/25

10/2

10/9

10/16

9/11

10/23

10/30

11/6

11/13

11/20

11/27

12/4

12/11

12/18

John Towns

X

cancelled

X

Status
colourRed
titleAbsent

X

X

X

Status
colourRed
titleABSENT

Status
colourRed
titleABSENT

Dina Meek

Status
colourRed
titleAbsent

X

X

X

X

Status
colourRed
titleAbsent

X

X

Tom Gulbransen

Status
colourRed
titleAbsent

X

X

X

X

Status
colourRed
titleAbsent

X

X

Lavanya Podilla

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

Jay Alameda

X

X

Status
colourRed
titleAbsent

X

X

X

X

Status
colourRed
titleABSENT

Shawn Strande

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

Cindy Wong

X

X

X

X

Status
colourRed
titleAbsent

X

X

X

Sharon Geva

X

Status
colourRed
titleAbsent

X

Status
colourRed
titleAbsent

X

X

Status
colourRed
titleABSENT

X

Kim Mann Bruch

X

Status
colourRed
titleAbsent

X

Status
colourRed
titleAbsent

X

X

X

X

Shannon Bradley

X

Status
colourRed
titleAbsent

X

Status
colourRed
titleAbsent

X

X

Status
colourRed
titleABSENT

Status
colourRed
titleABSENT


Decisions made during the meeting:

    Use Decision Macro


Agenda/Notes

  1. Updates from NSF (5 minutes)

    1. The EO has made a decision on AI

    2. Sharon attended the SAIL summit in Atlanta, there was a table for ACCESS, there were Stephen and Matt as well.

    3. There were some people who attended the ACCESS session

    4. A lot of people talk about the need for resources and when we say do you know what is ACCESS< and they so no, So Sharon thinks we should emphasize the fact that it is free.

    5. The flyer was good and the one pager was very nice and well tailored for the audience.

    6. There was a sign up sheet for the affinity group but no one signed up for it.

    7. Now there are 26 AI institutes, and there are ways of reaching out to them.

    8. GPU nodes is definitely a very likely commodity for these institutes. There are 2000 GPUs which are currently OAC funded which are not being utilized.

    9. Side topic - Shawn and maybe John will be in DC next week

    10. What is the best mechanism to connect the affinity groups with ACCESS? Right now we have 3000 people who have at least requested an allocation.

    11. Tom mentions that two third people didn’t know what is ACCESS and only one third knew about ACCESS. He didn’t feel like there was an urgency that they couldn’t get their duties completed without ACCESS.

    12. Some of the AI institutes are very new and just getting started.

  2. Review agenda for MY review (15 minutes)

    1. NSF provided feedback to the review outline

    2. Shawn has created a revised outline

  3. What have we heard from stakeholders? (5 minutes)

  4. Travel Stipend discussion

    1. Lavanya to submit an RTP by end of this week to secure a booth for ACCESS for the conference

    2. There is not going to be any sub awards for this supplemental request.

  5. Area updates (10+ minutes)

    1. ACO;

    2. Evaluation;

    3. Communications;

      1. Dina shared the pdf version of the highlights book,

      2. Some changes needed to ensure the dates and metrics provided are in alignment

    4. Community Engagement;

    5. Project Office;

    6. EAB;

      1. Cindy sent an email out to NSF, more details coming soon

Info

Parking Lot

  • Proposed change to IPR will be covered once John is back.

Next Meeting: 6th November 2023


Action Tracker:

  •  
  •  

Use Action Item Macro to track assigned To Do Items - check the box when it is complete

Format:


Reference