Versions Compared

Old Version 9

changes.mady.by.user Shannon Bradley

Saved on

compared with

New Version 10

changes.mady.by.user Shelley Knuth

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  1. Working Group Updates (15 mins)


  2. Approval of summaries from prior EC meetings John Towns (5 mins)

    1. 8 August 2023 EC Summary

  3. Program Milestone CheckJohn Towns (10 mins)

    1. Action item for the awardees to update their program milestones

    2. Reminder:Do not edit "Dashboard" tab, please edit "ACCESS program milestones" tab as needed

  4. Identifying, prioritizing, and addressing ACCESS tasks: Stephen Deems (10 mins)

    1. What’s our process for addressing items like the following that cross awardees? If we know of certain things that need addressed, how do we communicate (and to whom) to prioritize and track that? Some recent topics:

      1. ACCESS Account creation:

        1. Academic Status (currently optional field)

          1. ACCESS awardees and RPs are asking for this to be required

        2. Persons whose institutions aren’t in our database yet

          1. Process ill-defined and/or not implemented properly?

          2. Causes account creation process to stall (maybe?)

        3. Web/branding guidelines have not reached these pages

        4. Changing organizations — currently very difficult

          1. Is this a security concern that prevents ID holders from being able to do this?

          2. Could/should we preserve history of org. changes?

  5. Concerns about internal communication, specifically related to personas: Support Evaluation Update @Shelley Knuth (10 mins)

    1. I brought up at PEARC that Support intended to lead the personas conversation. My understanding is that there are a variety of parallel efforts that are being enacted

    2. As I also know, there are several iterations of the website currently underway

    3. These are all challenges as we strive to seek community feedback. I feel that we really need to discuss how to make sure we are all communicating betterSupport will be hosting feedback sessions at SC intended to understand more about services we are providing to the community and potential needs

    4. Will use CCEP dollars to host two on-site and pay for people’s travel

    5. Allows for options for people who wouldn’t get to SC otherwise, or for those who are already part of the ecosystem

    6. Is it valuable to have a separate feedback session for ACCESS wide needs? One specific to a service (like allocations)?

    7. Want to ensure we are all communicating about this/personas issue.

  6. Informational Items (10 mins)

    1. RAMPS David Hart Stephen Deems

    2. MATCH Shelley Knuth

      1. We would like to get an up to date list of the software that each of the RPs are running. Can Operations assist with getting this list? Otherwise we would need to do a workaround.

    3. CONECT Tim Boerner

    4. MMS Tom Furlani

    5. OpenCI John Towns


...