Versions Compared

Old Version 7

changes.mady.by.user Ron Payne

Saved on

compared with

New Version 8

changes.mady.by.user Stephen Deems

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  1. Approval of 21 June 2022 Interim EC summary (5 min)

  2. Informational Items (5 mins)

    1. RAMPS Shawn Brown (Unlicensed) Stephen Deems

      1. (With respect to sharing information with the community at PEARC) Can Tracks broadcast information / links on the “Advance to ACCESS” page in lieu of an ACCESS web domain?

    2. MATCH Shelley Knuth

    3. CONNECT Amy Schuele (Unlicensed)

    4. MMS Tom Furlani

    5. OpenCI John Towns

      1. Hoping to close on identifying person to take on Community Engagement and Development this week in wake of Tim needing to shift roles.

  3. 1 Sept. 2022 Critical PathJohn Towns (5 mins)

    1. Entries need to be completed by EoD June 22

  4. ACCESS Working Groups Management & Coordination (5 mins) John Towns

    1. Working Groups Wiki Coordination page

  5. Slack Usage John Towns (5 mins)

  6. ACCESS DNS & Domain (10 min) Amy Schuele (Unlicensed)

    1. Amy: I understand there are concerns with the access.org domain for use with infrastructure (Kerberos, etc) given the lease arrangement and that we are still running teragrid.org - so these can be really long running infrastructure commitments.  I’d like to explore if we should revisit the domain for this project - or at least for the infrastructure component of the project.

  7. Discussion of XUP -> AMP Transition PlanShelley Knuth (15 Mins)

    1. 21-June EC Meeting: John T. asked that all Tracks review the Track 2 transition plan and 1) identify if they will provide one or more of the Track 2 needs and 2) add their own needs.

  8. Requests for XSEDE to continue services beyond August 31, 2022 (10 minutes)

    1. John: Discussions with NSF RE: XSEDE operating services parts Aug 31, 2022: Specific requests are needed to assess. The story is not much different than related to you all last week. While I don’t want to have folks develop proposals as yet, I think I need to the following in order to get a response. The sooner I have this, the sooner I can get it to NSF for consideration. I need this for each service:

      1. XSEDE service you desire to have continued

      2. 1-2 sentence justification of need along with 1-2 sentence impact statement if not supported.

      3. duration of ongoing operation being requested

      4. estimated FTE effort

      5. estimated non-FTE costs

  9. Time permitting: EC Backlog Review: Update priority/indicate items for next EC meeting John Towns

...